Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ace
@ace
a big upside of building in public. people get pulled to your journey. you get to build your community while building your thing. downside? none. people might steal the idea? if you let them steal it and outdo you, it is theirs anyway.
9 replies
1 recast
59 reactions
Christian
@cristi
Execution matters more than the idea anyway - anyone can have ideas, not a lot can execute.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Matthew ๐ต๐ฉ๐ ๐ฎ๐
@mstublefield.eth
Do you think this applies to everything? I've been thinking about writing an e-learning course to help people lead product teams. And I've been thinking about building it in public like you suggest here, but I'm not sure how well that would work, or if it would actually be profitable. I wonder if anyone has tried.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
coachcoale.eth ๐ฉ
@coachcoale
well said, alex ๐๐ป๐๐ป
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Charlie G ๐ธO~
@charliegnft
Ribbit ๐
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
flick the dev ๐ฉ๐ฆ
@flick
building in the open is always more fun with an audience (speaking as someone that often times builds in the open w/o one) ๐
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike Fiuk
@michalfiuk
First time founders do seem to be overly concerned about folks "stealing their idea." Second time founders focus on distribution, execution, and learning from customers. Ideas aren't the barrier (maybe outside of deep/hard tech), execution is.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Naz
@naz1188
Agreed. While you are building in public, you are also creating countless opportunities for user feedback and potential collaborations which compound over timeโฆ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rick Crosschain
@rickcrosschain
Execution >>> ideas
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rektpapโ๐ต๐ฉ
@r3ktpapi.eth
๐ฏ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
