Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What is the most frustrating thing about Farcaster right now? Reply and like the replies from others that resonate. I’ll only ask clarifying questions (ie I won’t tell you you’re wrong) and then respond to a dozen or so top answers in a video this weekend with how we think about it.
103 replies
110 recasts
599 reactions

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
The fact that users have to pay just to create an account, there’s no “free trial” I know you guys are working on driving down the cost but it’s still unclear what the incentive is for non-WC apps to use FC for identity given that it adds friction and the value ultimately accrues to Merkle
7 replies
0 recast
25 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Is “free trial” a full read / write account from your pov? Or is free but read only sufficient?
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
I think it would be nice if they could have a little bit of storage to “try things out” but even read only would be huge since it would allow other apps to grow the identity graph
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

will pfp
will
@w
might be interesting if top casters were given “free invites” instead of eg 5 usdc (or perhaps in addition to)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Let's assume it's free to create an account — what incentive does an app have to grow the identity graph? Assume they use Sign in with Ethereum and enrich their user onboarding with Farcaster data permissionlessly (like Zora or Rodeo). Why add the additional complexity vs. work on a feature that can drive additional growth?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
Being able to register an fid without storage would be a big unlock
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction