Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What is the most frustrating thing about Farcaster right now? Reply and like the replies from others that resonate. I’ll only ask clarifying questions (ie I won’t tell you you’re wrong) and then respond to a dozen or so top answers in a video this weekend with how we think about it.
103 replies
110 recasts
599 reactions

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
The fact that users have to pay just to create an account, there’s no “free trial” I know you guys are working on driving down the cost but it’s still unclear what the incentive is for non-WC apps to use FC for identity given that it adds friction and the value ultimately accrues to Merkle
7 replies
0 recast
25 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Is “free trial” a full read / write account from your pov? Or is free but read only sufficient?
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
I think it would be nice if they could have a little bit of storage to “try things out” but even read only would be huge since it would allow other apps to grow the identity graph
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Hmmm there might be something here, but i feel like the users might feel worse after the experience if they dont find something worth converting for. ie then they signed up and didnt get to talk and wasted their time. Interesting concept though... like maybe its free but then the cliff is whenever you want to do your first onchain action, you then pay the onboarding fee
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

ns pfp
ns
@nickysap
Read only is fine. Tap a frame or interact in some way and get prompted to sign up
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction