Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zero Weight pfp
Zero Weight
@zeroweight
Nouns Proposal 550: Client Incentives: parameters setting and activation Reply with +for, +against, or +abstain and a reason to control 3 /nouns votes. Read prop → www.nouns.camp/proposals/550
7 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Zero Weight pfp
Zero Weight
@zeroweight
FOR! Vote has been cast. Thanks for weighing in.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xishal pfp
0xishal
@0xishal
+for
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

index pfp
index
@indexcard.eth
+for left curving it as i've been incentivized to work on something
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

wylin💎↑ pfp
wylin💎↑
@wylin
+ against | missed the nouncil vote; agreed with wag’s take. don’t agree with 40’s take that permissionless incentives with permissioned claims is an improvement over the previous model over pre-fund & build or build and hope for retro. mostly serves to benefit camp’s next VC fundraise as a claim to revenue imo
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
+for
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
+against
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
+for
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction