Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zero Weight
@zeroweight
Nouns Proposal 550: Client Incentives: parameters setting and activation Reply with +for, +against, or +abstain and a reason to control 3 /nouns votes. Read prop → www.nouns.camp/proposals/550
7 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
wylin💎↑
@wylin
+ against | missed the nouncil vote; agreed with wag’s take. don’t agree with 40’s take that permissionless incentives with permissioned claims is an improvement over the previous model over pre-fund & build or build and hope for retro. mostly serves to benefit camp’s next VC fundraise as a claim to revenue imo
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
