Part 2 of casts that can't be tweets

Intelligence is largely determined by genetics

& generally higher IQ = more productive member of society

Which leads to the implication that state-subsidized egg/sperm/embryo creation + sequencing/ranking

Should absolutely be done

founder @vardaspace village idiot @foundersfund

What complicates this is IQ is a somewhat poor scoring metric of intelligence. There are many forms, such as EQ, and optimizing for one via eugenics would lead to the erosion of others. We would need significantly better metrics than our current approach for this to be viable.

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

I think the way to solve for this is to allow for different parents to optimize for different traits

Lebron makes tall kids, Elon makes aspy-smart ones etc

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

there are many links from a gene to an outcome, some of which are still very opaque and we might be unintentionally stepping in the opposite direction of where we are trying to go

this model seems more likely to have a positive impact than state sponsored ranking (if i understanding correctly) 

we're still not very good at predicting outlier 10,000x talent (churchills, musks of the world) even when they are young adults

Interestingly, this was kind of how Brave New World perceived it too — in that there was selection of traits for distinct castes. I don’t think parents doing their own gene selection process is inherently bad — it essentially happens when selecting a partner in the first place