Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
woj ツ
@woj.eth
ok the fast approval of EIP-7514 actually makes me question the ethereum credible neutrality for the first time ever if this goes live in Dencun, it clearly shows that the core devs can push changes to the network at will
12 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
Jack.top
@jacktop
I do wonder if Ethereum's govnance approach of "social consensus" ultimately ends similar to on chain governance. It seems to be a case of the community influencers control what goes in vs the largest token holders. It perhaps works currently when there are (hopefully!) good actors but that may not always be the case
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
woj ツ
@woj.eth
1/2 > influencers control what goes in oh boy i have a controversial opinion on this i believe eth influencers mostly deserve their place in the ecosystem. people like @sassal.eth @evanvanness or @ryanb.eth just put a ton of work to publish high quality content regularly and also spend a lot of time talking to core devs
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
woj ツ
@woj.eth
2/2 i started writing more recently and realized how much goes into having a clear thought that is also not wrong 90% of the time they built their social capital over both good and tough times and its not like they think for everybody, usually its informing about the changes that will happen with some opinion on top
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
woj ツ
@woj.eth
3/2 so while the voice of few influencers is indeed oversized in the debate, i treat this as an organic and a healthy move on the contrary, onchain governance currently can ge bought or gamed in too many ways, thus i don't support it (but never say never, OP governance experiments with this in some cool directions)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
