Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
It’s interesting to see people using this vote to re-litigate the fork as a mechanism. Saying “I don’t like the fork so let’s make it not work very well” seems odd https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/642?tab=activity
3 replies
21 recasts
76 reactions

mono 🐵 🥌 pfp
mono 🐵 🥌
@0xmonografia
there's no improvement to the mechanism, just a different % setting. saying, “people don't like the fork and interfere with it” seems odd
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
The most compelling case against this prop and the fork is how it affects the daos ability to claim non profit status as (and if) it transitions to a duna But yea, saying “arber bad” is a misunderstanding. The irony is folks want to lower the threshold so they can leave a duna nouns, but cannot, because doing so would harm the chances of the dao becoming a duna. My take is that if forking harms the chances of becoming a duna so severely, those in favor (foundation, wag, etc) should have made sure an alt minority protection mechanism was in place before going live with duna prop and pulling the fire alarm on fork
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
ya its odd, pros/cons w lowering but that is not a compelling argument
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction