Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Will Papper pfp
Will Papper
@will
I’m curious: Has Nouns ever permanently canceled a streaming payment? It’s an interesting question since streams are often a way to get larger proposals over the line, but rarely evaluated or canceled I only see https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/482 which was canceled for logistical reasons and then re-created
5 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Ben pfp
Ben
@jarmen
No not on anyone who has had it correctly started
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
Yeah bearish streams of that model. Huge activation energy to cancel. We must ask less of our voters. Excited for the work @vrbs team is doing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rafa (Devcon) pfp
rafa (Devcon)
@rafa
The main issue is that social politeness etc plus coordination of DAO to penalize project with unknown status is fairly high risk. Streams should be cancellable by either oracle or direct accountability team overseeing proposal progress. Until then, unlikely many proposals will have payments cancelled even if they rug
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cole Perkins pfp
Cole Perkins
@coleperkins
Not sure about nouns but has happened to service providers for other DAOs in the past. https://snapshot.org/#/aave.eth/proposal/0xceae27bbaf42658a1b46baec664c66c09f9cba4f9452ed2d2bed6f6ce5c66e35
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben pfp
Ben
@jarmen
Pipe new prop should have a node, and yield streamed not gifting him 32e to do it. Understanding its a logistical nightmare to have Dao owned nodes.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction