Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
A subtle but significant way that tech companies will continue to undermine user attempts to control their data, without stronger regulatory protections cc @eulerlagrange.eth @evin
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
evin
@evin
💯 In the EU you can *kind of* get a clean handoff via email whereas in CA/VA you cannot You’re right tho “Computer legible” != verifiable
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
For my company /opacity we make the assumption cooperation from anyone but the user is a waste of time. It’s def an engineering approach, but we have zkTLS with the collusion issue solved. I really don’t think it’s worth trying to get companies to do stuff against their economic incentives
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
https://testflight.apple.com/join/wfkqexrx Product is better than words ;)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
One of the reasons I was thinking about this topic is because you showed me how even your approach is capped by Twitter to your first 5k followers Which makes it hard for Farcaster to allow Twitter influencers to join the platform and notify their followers of joining -> a way incumbents keep out new entrants
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
You can still get everyone to pull out who their following. That’s what @slokh wants to add to nook
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction