Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
A subtle but significant way that tech companies will continue to undermine user attempts to control their data, without stronger regulatory protections cc @eulerlagrange.eth @evin
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions

evin pfp
evin
@evin
💯 In the EU you can *kind of* get a clean handoff via email whereas in CA/VA you cannot You’re right tho “Computer legible” != verifiable
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
For my company /opacity we make the assumption cooperation from anyone but the user is a waste of time. It’s def an engineering approach, but we have zkTLS with the collusion issue solved. I really don’t think it’s worth trying to get companies to do stuff against their economic incentives
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
In EU does the email handoff apply to verifying the contents with DMARC? Looking at Twitter takeout for ex, they send an email that links to Twitter where you download the file
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction