borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@warpcastadmin.eth
gm, wake up babe telegram sold all user data to russian government, now it's official forbes.ru/tekhnologii/498530-mts-dogovorilas-s-telegram-o-reklamnom-partnerstve
20 replies
17 recasts
52 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
What am I missing in the article? It’s mentioning a partnership with Мобильные ТелеСистемы — I’d assume they have a relationship with the government (who doesn’t in Russia, you’re kind of forced to), but what about the deal means what you say it means?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@warpcastadmin.eth
mts is virtually owned by russian government and now tg gives the government mapping between phone numbers and tg accounts then you can match phone number to other data from other sources and boom you have a mapping between tg account and your home address
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
ah, gotcha. this is one of the things i dislike about signal – though not the worst of things. at least signal has E2EE for group convos, even if an inefficient model.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@warpcastadmin.eth
agreed on signal, very much looking forward to no-cellphone signal accounts (they need to come soon) @pugson this is how you should've asked the question to get more data (no bs like "i'm already doxxed doesn't affect me haha")
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
pugson
@pugson
fair enough, thanks. my phone number is tied to my current home address via various sources (gov biz registry, shipping companies, online orders, KYC) either way so it *still* doesn't affect me in any meaningful way. what i can do is change my telegram phone number to minimize the risk.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Louis 👵 🦇🔊
@superlouis.eth
I’d like to see Olvid get more traction. E2E encrypted without phone number registration. You can create as many identities as you like.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
I'd like to see Signal actually make a meaningful move with PQC, their current proposed change still hierarchically binds to EC as the root authority, so it's kind of a moot point. Also, maybe not Kyber given some curiosities happening with the NIST selection process.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction