Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Kinda feel like using a different name for the app and protocol was a mistake. Non-crypto natives gonna be confused
12 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
really? I think it was essential. Beyond making fully understanding the ecosystem a bit more complicated, whats the risk you see?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Agreed! I think the biggest differentiator from traditional socials is the decoupling of the protocol and the client.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
It is a differentiator. I certainly care about it. 1. How many of your friends do (non-crypto)? 2. How long it would it take you to convince them it is important? My position comes from the answers being: 1. Not many 2. Longer than ideal
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Valid points! I think the use case will become clearer as more clients are built. Eg I can imagine an insta3 for image only posts rather than a Twitter esque feed. Once that happens, having the same fc name the entire time will become impossibly confusing for new people, unless they understand the base protocol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction