Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Kinda feel like using a different name for the app and protocol was a mistake. Non-crypto natives gonna be confused
11 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Jess Sloss !!! pfp
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
really? I think it was essential. Beyond making fully understanding the ecosystem a bit more complicated, whats the risk you see?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
I understand the reasoning behind. The reasoning is very crypto native though. I find myself joining “join FC”, and then I get asked “then why’d you send me a WC link”. Then I explain the whole client diversity thing and then I lose them. Less to explain is just easier for everyone :)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Agreed! I think the biggest differentiator from traditional socials is the decoupling of the protocol and the client.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cassie  pfp
Cassie
@cndx
I agree, it is essential It's just people still get protocols confused as the dApp or product itself in my experience
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction