Kinda feel like using a different name for the app and protocol was a mistake.

Non-crypto natives gonna be confused

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

http://opacity.network

really? I think it was essential. 

Beyond making fully understanding the ecosystem a bit more complicated, whats the risk you see?

Building /seedclub 🌱 /consumercrypto 

Make something people want to be a part of

Agreed! I think the biggest differentiator from traditional socials is the decoupling of the protocol and the client.

/cal 

Photographer, Artist, Web3 Educator, IP Lawyer, Patent Agent, Explorer 📸⛰️✨ 

 Building /flowcast with /mindfulness 🌊

https://wanderloots.com/links

Valid points! I think the use case will become clearer as more clients are built. 

Eg I can imagine an insta3 for image only posts rather than a Twitter esque feed. Once that happens, having the same fc name the entire time will become impossibly confusing for new people, unless they understand the base protocol

It is a differentiator. I certainly care about it.

1. How many of your friends do (non-crypto)? 

2. How long it would it take you to convince them it is important?

My position comes from the answers being:

1. Not many
2. Longer than ideal