🧭Recalibrating 🌍Worldbuilding

Curious what people’s thoughts are: 🤔 

The poll is anonymous, but would love to hear your reasons if you would like to comment & share ✨

Curious what people’s thoughts are: 🤔 

The poll is anonymous, but would love to hear your reasons if you would like to comment & share ✨ 

https://frame.weponder.io/api/polls/28693

/cal 

Photographer, Artist, Web3 Educator, IP Lawyer, Patent Agent, Explorer 📸⛰️✨ 

 Building /flowcast with /mindfulness 🌊

https://wanderloots.com/links

the exact same image? 1 billion % that's bad practice

why? If Rodeo is facilitating the sale of stickers, why should that prevent an archival print sale? 

IRL, we would never have this issue, because people would instantly recognize the relative value of the physical good. imo, a platform like Rodeo = sticker printing, and is instantly recognizable as such

I think by introducing the concept of "digital scarcity", we inherently bring in the physical realm, as that is the realm of scarcity.

Receipts, by definition, are indicative of the thing being purchased (and are also inherently a physical analogy). Buying a poster is different than buying a fine-art print; each would result in a different receipt based on the purchase price, store that sold it, etc. 

If the tokens are representative of an idea (which I agree, they are value encapsulations), why does that preclude differentiating tokens based on the contract that produced them? 

If someone is buying a social media post vs buying a 1/1, would that not be an entirely different idea encapsulation, as represented by the token, a direct byproduct of the contract? In both cases, the creator retains the IP associated with the good; the only difference is how the value is bundled.

these physical world analogies do not translate. tokens are tokens are tokens. each represents a single idea, how it's fractionalized is irrelevant. we unneedingly devalue tokens and create confusion by drawing analogies like stickers; they are all just receipts