0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
8 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
I think by introducing the concept of "digital scarcity", we inherently bring in the physical realm, as that is the realm of scarcity.
Receipts, by definition, are indicative of the thing being purchased (and are also inherently a physical analogy). Buying a poster is different than buying a fine-art print; each would result in a different receipt based on the purchase price, store that sold it, etc.
If the tokens are representative of an idea (which I agree, they are value encapsulations), why does that preclude differentiating tokens based on the contract that produced them?
If someone is buying a social media post vs buying a 1/1, would that not be an entirely different idea encapsulation, as represented by the token, a direct byproduct of the contract? In both cases, the creator retains the IP associated with the good; the only difference is how the value is bundled. 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
