Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

some thoughts on % exit: if every dao spend proportionally reduces the exit value, sounds rational to exit before a large spend and rejoin after. perhaps difficult if holding many nouns, but makes sense if only holding one?
assuming the dao has no significant income (like today).
wdyt @w-g

part of verbs team, working on nouns things

Do agree that it points dao increasingly towards incremental spends (again more a function of reducing threshold) which I think is a good direction. Not sure if streaming payments can be reworked so that they debit the treasury/exit pool directly over time, for example. It also makes the risk of rug more bi-directional

a programmable withdrawal queue seems like a good addition; think initial conditions can be set low (tbh I think attempting to persistently rebase your exitable value is a losing game but something ofc we can monitor) 

agree dao would likely tend towards amortizable funding which am excited about. decentralization etc

for streams that can be a good solution (would require significant rework). other large spends still suffer from this issue. curious if you have a preferred friction mechanism (as asked in other reply)