Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
david
@davidbr
Looking for feedback on a model for protocol rewards compensation. V1 will reward for proposals, voting & auction bids. The model shows which knobs the DAO has and how that translates into the comp that a clients can get Is something unclear? Do you suggestions for improvement? https://tinyurl.com/rewards-model
6 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
w-g
@w-g
don’t think I understand much of this; offhand would say, fixed % of treasury for voting I am 95% sure is a good idea (effectively slashing for inactivity) Charging a deposit for props proportional to proposal quantity (refundable if succeeds) imo is a better model than rewarding . Nouns vers of eip1559
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g
@w-g
*think as much as 5% of auction proceeds to voting (claimable by noun wallet not delegate) may make sense. Mandating vwr for each may make addtl sense so that there is pow attached . Then..maybe (50% sure) add means for dao to slash indiv nouns if vwr are low signal
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Elad
@el4d
This model is about how we might budget for protocol rewards, so nouns clients can earn enough to keep the lights on and catch up with protocol changes. Not trying to make this enough for heavy lifting. This is ahead of sunsetting nouns.wtf and wanting to have good alternatives. Makes sense?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
