Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
david
@davidbr
Looking for feedback on a model for protocol rewards compensation. V1 will reward for proposals, voting & auction bids. The model shows which knobs the DAO has and how that translates into the comp that a clients can get Is something unclear? Do you suggestions for improvement? https://tinyurl.com/rewards-model
6 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
I think it would be better to aim for a fixed budget for a time period that's shared across clients based on percentage share of usage rather than reward per action. in this model props volume could 2x our budgeting goes out of proportion. alternatively there could be a drought of props and clients lose revenue
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
martin ↑
@martin
I don't have strong thoughts on the rewards for proposals, but arguably could be fun being even more ambitious with the auction rewards. The thinking being - how much is it worth to the DAO to get more bids? With the votes, there's sort of a fixed "demand" for voting -
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
is the proposal reward only for successful proposals? seems like it should be at first glance.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
Not really sure this makes sense because not all proposals are creating software, for instance a prop to increase fork threshold does not need to be rewarded as it has no ongoing costs, same with the Nouns gift props.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g
@w-g
also 90% sure rewarding auction buyers/bidders is not a good idea
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
w-g
@w-g
don’t think I understand much of this; offhand would say, fixed % of treasury for voting I am 95% sure is a good idea (effectively slashing for inactivity) Charging a deposit for props proportional to proposal quantity (refundable if succeeds) imo is a better model than rewarding . Nouns vers of eip1559
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
