data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18a22/18a22d952f6d0987a856397a2323bd7fff7b3237" alt="Illia pfp"
Illia
@vodolad
1 reply
6 recasts
12 reactions
0 reply
28 recasts
133 reactions
28 replies
93 recasts
492 reactions
3 replies
1 recast
14 reactions
1 reply
28 recasts
108 reactions
9 replies
157 recasts
409 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
30 reactions
9 replies
10 recasts
85 reactions
5 replies
0 recast
42 reactions
4 replies
1 recast
16 reactions
2 replies
11 recasts
39 reactions
4 replies
18 recasts
97 reactions
12 replies
23 recasts
173 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
2 replies
14 recasts
72 reactions
12 replies
77 recasts
231 reactions
23 replies
29 recasts
304 reactions
I haven't commented about rollups in several months, if not over a year, so I'm just a casual observer now...
Native rollups are pretty cool, and what I meant by "enshrined zkEVM bridge" a couple of years ago (except they've got a wider scope than zkEVMs)
However, they are not "enshrined rollups", as I wrote about them at least, which are in-protocol, L1 rollups
Overarching thought on rollups: there simply has not been anywhere enough demand to saturate 1,000+ chains by 2025 like I had expected in 2021. Including all L1s and L2s, there's maybe like 10, at most. I'm sure demand will grow, but not to the magnitude anyone expected. It would be prudent to factor in this lower terminal demand in infrastructure designs, instead of just "build it they'll come" hopium.
https://x.com/apolynya/status/1629651981768990720 2 replies
81 recasts
197 reactions
9 replies
119 recasts
237 reactions
7 replies
10 recasts
102 reactions