Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Welcome to @vitalik.eth, co-founder of Ethereum! He’s kindly agreed to do an AMA. Reply with your questions. :)
216 replies
152 recasts
495 reactions
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
In a future full of embedded wallets, do people have: 1) Primarily a new address for every new app, 2) Primarily one address across many apps, or 3) A fairly even spectrum?
4 replies
1 recast
19 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Today we're at (2). I hope that we move closer to (1), as that would be better for privacy. Sometimes it makes sense for different apps to share wallets, but that should not be the default. We also need to keep improving ZK sends so that the privacy gains from splitting activity become actually real.
5 replies
5 recasts
64 reactions
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
Follow up on this - do you see these distinct wallets in each app, or “virtual accounts” that are still managed in a single branded wallet like Metamask? I.e you log in with Metamask and it generates an address per site, or log in with email/social and generate a wallet per site?
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I definitely hope that it's one wallet and it generates an address per site. Each app having a custom wallet would be a disaster imo.
3 replies
2 recasts
28 reactions
maks
@maks
Just use 6551 ;)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ɃΞrn
@b7
@woj.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Karandeep Singh
@karandeep
Every site/application should issue an NFT to the user on registration/first use, and that NFT should be linked to an ERC 4337 scw with different plug-in/extentions as per dapp needs. A classic mix of ERC 6551×4337 with stealth addresses.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
