Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Welcome to @vitalik.eth, co-founder of Ethereum! He’s kindly agreed to do an AMA. Reply with your questions. :)
192 replies
81 recasts
529 reactions
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
In a future full of embedded wallets, do people have: 1) Primarily a new address for every new app, 2) Primarily one address across many apps, or 3) A fairly even spectrum?
4 replies
1 recast
19 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Today we're at (2). I hope that we move closer to (1), as that would be better for privacy. Sometimes it makes sense for different apps to share wallets, but that should not be the default. We also need to keep improving ZK sends so that the privacy gains from splitting activity become actually real.
3 replies
5 recasts
54 reactions
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
Follow up on this - do you see these distinct wallets in each app, or “virtual accounts” that are still managed in a single branded wallet like Metamask? I.e you log in with Metamask and it generates an address per site, or log in with email/social and generate a wallet per site?
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
To that end, what are the biggest unlocks necessary to making session keys a core part of ethereum app usage moving forward? What comes after 4337?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
In world (1), is the idea that each app operates across chains? If not, what's your preferred fix for unambious addressing? (Solving the issue that eg friendtech recently ran into, where people sent assets to their friendtech address on mainnet.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
