Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Five years ago: cheering each other on, could not imagine any other way Today: lawsuit The safety vs eacc schism should not be underrated as a limit to how much SV tech can actually remain a single tribe. I continue to wish for more balanced ways forward.
27 replies
374 recasts
1629 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
It reminds me a bit of the strange phenomenon that a Catholic and a Protestant are prone to disagreeing more vehemently with each other than either with an Atheist. Or maybe I should pose this as a question: Do Sam and Elon now have less affinity with each other than either with Trad Politics as a whole?
1 reply
1 recast
16 reactions
Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
not even the worst of it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Stopa pfp
Michael Stopa
@peachmouse21
Do you agree with the saying that AI is "communist" (as it seems to increase the advantage of centralized entities such as the Big Tech and the Chinese Communist Party) whereas Blockchain is more "libertarian", @vitalik.eth? Rhetorical question?:))
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
John Camkiran pfp
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
Raising funds as a nonprofit then going for-profit is wickedness of the highest order
0 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
BORED 🥱 pfp
BORED 🥱
@bored
Ah Twitter. Where friends become enemies and hopefully enemies become friends. Imagine if these legends played positive sum games with each other.
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Manan pfp
Manan
@manan
How is this different from other schisms resulting in divergent chip architecture (Intel vs. Nvidia) or cloud vs. node compute architecture (Google vs. Apple)?
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
Jack McDermott pfp
Jack McDermott
@jackmcdermott
Let’s not this become us, Web3
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
francis🎩 pfp
francis🎩
@greenfarmer
Right decision imho. Wouldn’t you have done the same?
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
ΛDRIΛN 👽🛸 pfp
ΛDRIΛN 👽🛸
@adrianandreev.eth
@Bittensor I believe, is more in line with crypto…. OpenAI does not appear to be. I think Elon has a point with the lawsuit. Litigation could bring light to things that may change people’s minds about OpenAI🤷
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
eltier pfp
eltier
@eltier
the interesting part imo is where elon claims AGI has partially been accomplished and that his investment wasnt used for non profit purposes and instead a for profit product was built with it.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Anniceris 🎩 pfp
Anniceris 🎩
@anniceris
Which one is safety and which is eacc in this particular schism?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
aseprite pfp
aseprite
@aseprite.eth
$Tao can help this situation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
inxanity 🃏 pfp
inxanity 🃏
@police
Elon is jealous because he doesn't lead the industry
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tony Palko pfp
Tony Palko
@tonypalko
I don't see any cool technology / innovation that requires relying on traditional "gun" like lawsuit to protect his rights. As you see in crypto opposite, traditional entities like SEC resorting to lawsuits against crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gaudenzio.eth pfp
gaudenzio.eth
@gaudenzio.eth
elon musk is shit.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gideon pfp
Gideon
@gideonro
Polarity in points of view is healthy. What we need though are better consensus forming tools and processes for bridging these chasms. It's why tools like Pol.is are so interesting.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
eatzebugs🎩 pfp
eatzebugs🎩
@eatzebugs
ai is only good for making based memes. anything beyawnd that is the realm of the sacrosanct
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Javi pfp
Javi
@javichipi
Elon has a small army of lawyers on staff and is pretty litigious nowadays. Hope this works out for all parties (and society).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
basebro.eth pfp
basebro.eth
@basebro.eth
Competition between AI LLMs is a good thing, and that is probably what is going on here.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction