Looks like Sam's likely outcome flipped a total of *four* times over the last week. Must have been intensely stressful for him.

I hope that world-consequential AI firms can have governance that is more open and transparent. Neither the "profit maxing trad corp" nor the "unaccountable board of 5 people making decisions based on secret knowledge" thing sit well with me. Need a better approach.

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

I do think the nebulousness is on balance good.

Do we *want* there to exist a specific set of people who have a clear formally specified right to get together and vote to make a DAO fork?

The strategic ambiguity in the current approach actually makes such actions appropriately costly imo.

Ok but what would you recommend? Famously Ethereum governance is… at best nebulous.

If anything, this situation truly highlighted the importance of governance and decentralization.

It highlighted that so many have a strong dependency on a single company's offerings which could be threatened by a few actors.

Deliberative governance and decision Legos

Deliberative governance and decision Legos https://explorer.gitcoin.co/#/round/42161/0xa7608d95a93cc684f2719323d40cbd0f59afe7d4/0xa7608d95a93cc684f2719323d40cbd0f59afe7d4-20