Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
To me, the most underrated counterargument to the Pascal's Wager is that it ignores that your actions can have consequences on either side of zero. Once you take that into account, many things move from "seeming no-brainer" to "totally undecidable omg what the heck do I do"
30 replies
384 recasts
1827 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
(And yes, like all Pascal's Wager discourse in the 2020s, this has an AI safety tie-in. Soooo many actions done in the name of AI safety so far seem to have had very ambiguous consequences (Premise: all the other AI labs are reckless, I'll make one that focuses on safety! 2 years later: we have n+1 reckless AI labs))
6 replies
94 recasts
641 reactions

nikolaii.base.eth 🚀 pfp
nikolaii.base.eth 🚀
@nikolaiii
So "don't worship" is the worst choice. Other two are mathematically equal.
1 reply
2 recasts
9 reactions

polar pfp
polar
@polar
what about Nietzsche's eternal recurrence. i bet that one looks sweet
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

John Camkiran pfp
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
My favourite interpretation of an ‘antigod’ is a god that has set up religion as a test to determine which of its creations will not live life more or less like an automaton, despite being instructed to do so.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Daniel Fernandes pfp
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
Pascal's Wager was the original (3,3), few understand this
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Britt Kim pfp
Britt Kim
@brittkim.eth
What Pascal didn't understand is that the bottom-right quad is actually positive 69.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
You have 83 years, your mission: to find and believe in the infinite utility idea.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

moreReese pfp
moreReese
@morereese
Do these charts imply that belief in God’s existence require worship? Or maybe worship is a belief function implementation…🤔
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Elie pfp
Elie
@elie
Also in a world that God does exist. But you only worshipped him because of Pascal. That God probably thinks you’re an idiot and you get -30000 anyway 😂 If there is a God, it’s doubtful he cares how much you believe in him. Especially as he hasn’t made it obvious that he does. He probably does care if you’re a good person. And that would be true regardless if you believe in him or not.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

borst pfp
borst
@borst.eth
can I get a hullo laddie
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

NutellaCrepe 🎩🍖 pfp
NutellaCrepe 🎩🍖
@nutellacrepe.eth
Agree Also hot take Some people who worship God do the most despicable things, and vice versa 😕
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Yuliia pfp
Yuliia
@yuliayuliaok
You have such thoughts that I don't even know how to put it all in my head😳
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TAHA AMNAY pfp
TAHA AMNAY
@0xamnay
the reality allah exist :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

AmoR pfp
AmoR
@iamrom4k
Hi. The risky choice, according to Pascal, is to live as if God does not exist. Maybe this will help you in your decision)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

trythencatch pfp
trythencatch
@trythencatch
what is your opinion about zksync.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wesley pfp
Wesley
@wesley-472
U lost ETH
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan666.eth🎩 pfp
Ethan666.eth🎩
@ethan666
🎁 for you on jam.so
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Fran pfp
Fran
@0x99fran
When you consider that the number of potential deities is infinite and that what is considered “worship” or “damnable offenses” could also be an infinite set it really blows up the square.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

picka4u pfp
picka4u
@picka4u
Okay, I got you) Where should you shout “bingo”? You forgot to cross out the boxes 😀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction