Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
"RFPs put people in competition with each other, they do not encourage collaboration" - panelist at a public health event I am attending But doesn't any funding mechanism that has a fixed amount of money to give away put people in competition with each other? What are the best ways to minimize this?
13 replies
4 recasts
38 reactions
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
If you don’t encourage any competition, you’re going to get mediocre results imo I think the size of the prize is the best lever to control balance between competition and collaboration. If it’s large enough, groups of people will be willing to team up to split winnings.
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
Competition is good. If folks wanna work on an RFP together, there’s nothing stopping them. 1 maximally collaborated RFP is not better than 2 RFPs
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
᠎ pfp
᠎
@m-j-r.eth
RFPs = bidding to complete the project. the only downside I can see is that involved parties might externalize some other nth-order opportunity/nuance. seems like the fixed scope & oversimplified design is more the issue, maybe RFPs should be grounded to a much larger picture & lose out if cooperation isn't complete.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trent pfp
Trent
@trent
Protocol guild starts from the view that Ethereum is created through the efforts of many individuals in collaboration. Rough consensus, multi-client, credibly neutral The funding mechanism should match this reality Time boxed QF rounds & rpgf pit people against each other in their campaign for allocator attention
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I respond to (advisory) RFPs for a living. Many of them are large and monolithic because clients haven’t taken the time to research and play to the relative strengths of different respondents by splitting them up. Yet collaboration on RFPs is often expensive because you split the revenue but double the overhead costs
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nixo pfp
nixo
@nixo
if future funding opportunities are somewhat dependent on the community looking for funding and i think my project will sweep the funding and cause rancor, i'm more likely to collaborate
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Opensailor.degen🔄🎩🎭🔵 pfp
Opensailor.degen🔄🎩🎭🔵
@opensailor
🚀 Your cast cashed in! Claim 🎩 DEGEN tokens on jam now! 🟣 https://jam.so/?referrer=X0cAnl 🟣
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bayram pfp
Bayram
@bayka.eth
I think the collaboration vs competition dichotomy is kinda misleading. Evolutionary biology proves we need both. Companies will choose one or both forms depending upon the RFP and environment, so I dont think we need explicit ways to mitigate competition.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lindsey pfp
Lindsey
@goforlindsey
I’d argue the competition in using an RFP framework isn’t necessarily bad and something DAOs specifically could benefit from. If you look at the ENS endowment proposal (which used an RFP) the quality and competition from service providers in that bid created one of the more healthy selection process I’ve seen.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ralph.email.eth pfp
ralph.email.eth
@
https://warpcast.com/mlb/0x4f6f5c
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rob Morris pfp
Rob Morris
@recipromancer.eth
RFPs inevitably incentivise targeting of the bid criteria, contract management, and technical cost/scope bombs, rather than genuine alignment between bidder and procurer. This is counter-productive competition. Incentivise competitor on what you want, not what you don’t.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Keating pfp
Keating
@keating.eth
Maybe by making the RFP applications or process public. There will still be competition to win the RFP, but a team will easily be able to find collaborators if there are knowledge/skills gaps needed to deliver on the RFP.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alphacaster 🎩 pfp
Alphacaster 🎩
@alphacaster.eth
Sorry for out of context but When vitalik.eth sir ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction