Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
humpty
@humpty
Badges is just another word for reputation. Limiting it to the number of followers was never gonna work. But the power badge is still limited in its ability to detect legitimate, active users. Why not leverage open data to make more comprehensive determinations?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
How would you do it?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
humpty
@humpty
long response so using a screenshot instead. happy to keep the conversation going plus share my feedback from precious products built and used that operate in this space.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
humpty
@humpty
*previous not precious
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
We've tried a lot of the onchain stuff, couldn't get it to work. Too many low quality accounts have credentials, balances, attestations etc. The best predictor of quality in our experience is "who likes your stuff". All the onchain signals can usually be purchased or grinded through by a dedicated airdrop farmer.
5 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
have you seen any examples of recursive attestations that didn’t work? 👀 ie where trusted entity attests to trusted users and proliferates out from there? and what attestations and credentials did you consider?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I haven’t found any that have! If you have good examples of attestations that would help identify several thousand quality farcaster users with a low false positive rate, I’m all ears
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
well, we do have Farcaster qDAU and qBuilder recursive attestations on Icebreaker already what we don’t have yet is the graph - but will add that very soon :) then we’ll allow recursive attestations from the trusted seed (us + you + whoever we attest to) here’s a live example of the flow
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
