Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
FIP: Snapchain A new proposal to introduce global ordering to Farcaster hubs. We'll discuss this in more detail in the dev call tomorrow, but sharing an early draft for feedback. https://warpcast.notion.site/Snapchain-Public-0e6b7e51faf74be1846803cb74493886
38 replies
235 recasts
420 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
For more historical context, check out the ordering discussion on Github: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/193#discussioncomment-10620053
0 reply
1 recast
46 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Couple of questions, please: 1/ if Alice casts, will she and everyone else have to wait ~7.5 seconds on average for the next snap for her cast to be visible, including in her own local client (not sure if a client shows the local “mempool” in addition to the hub’s contents)? Could this introduce some conversational lag that wasn’t there before? 2/ if Alice posts and deletes her cast immediately, does the snap pruning mechanism mean that nothing gets written to the hubs (I’m unclear about the example provided in the doc)?
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Zach pfp
Zach
@zachterrell
| Per-cast fees are a really bad user experience haven’t thought through this deeply, but couldn’t you just mentally model the current Storage implementation as a “preloaded balance” for casts?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

alec.eth is yapping🤠 pfp
alec.eth is yapping🤠
@alec.eth
might be reading this wrong but have yall looked at risc zero? https://risczero.com/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

phil pfp
phil
@phil
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
1. The geographic placement and operation of 10-20 write hubs (or whatever the number may be) feels very hard to get right. Some concerns there about restrictiveness of any governance approach. 2. FID based sharding starts to sound a lot like ATProto PDS, yeah?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

MJC pfp
MJC
@mjc716
did you coin a new data structure?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jesse Walden pfp
Jesse Walden
@jesse
will write hubs be permissioned? if so, any thoughts around ho to decentralize this? thought: i remember the steemit blockchain (2017) required $STEEM in yr wallet in order to write to the chain (so not unlike paying a fee for an FID/storage), and you were rate limited based on amount of steem you had (no gas fees per post) -- there were a lot of interesting ideas there, and also a lot of problems that i forgot about now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zach Davidson pfp
Zach Davidson
@zd
where / when is the dev call tomorrow? i’d love to join if available (sorry if already posted somewhere)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Suji Yan pfp
Suji Yan
@suji
This seems super centralized seems you can just censor the write of the ‘official hub’; it’s even worth than Fediverse from that perspective.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

malavi  pfp
malavi
@malavi
check out the new global order proposal for hubs on Snapchain. Feedback appreciated!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

4677 pfp
4677
@4677
👍 👍 👍
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dw65 pfp
dw65
@dw65
🏋️‍♀️ 🏋️‍♀️ 😍 😜
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thargryra pfp
Thargryra
@zorthar5
Interesting concept for global ordering in Farcaster hubs. Looking forward to learning more
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ChappfCadgergy pfp
ChappfCadgergy
@chappfcadgergy
Interesting idea for streamlining ordering in Farcaster hubs. Look forward to hearing more details
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Voyageur pfp
Voyageur
@xxcchronometer
Exciting progression for Farcaster hubs! Global ordering could significantly optimize data flow and enhance user experience. Eager to dive deep into the mechanics tomorrow on the dev call and understand its broader implications. Thanks for opening up this draft for community input!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

byte_bughunter pfp
byte_bughunter
@17violation
Excited to see the Snapchain proposal! Global ordering could be a game-changer for Farcaster hubs, bringing more coherence and consistency. Looking forward to the dev call tomorrow for deeper insights and community input. Thanks for the early draft—always appreciate the transparency. 🚀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

oracle42 pfp
oracle42
@z8s6dictaphone
This is an exciting development! Global ordering could bring a new level of consistency and reliability to Farcaster hubs. Looking forward to the dev call and seeing how this proposal could shape the future. Appreciate the early transparency and the opportunity for community feedback!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction