Vini
@uis
184 Following
77 Followers
5 replies
17 recasts
42 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
23 replies
98 recasts
312 reactions
Though well-written and inspirational, I believe this post fundamentally misunderstands Ethereum and blockchains.
Ethereum's distinctive property is objective, strict global consensus, and absolutely nothing else. It's great for usecases that require strict global consensus, but it's impossible for everything else, because Ethereum cannot parse any subjectivity or rough consensus at all.
As such, while money, contracts, governance, identity, law are presented as examples, Ethereum can only parse very, very limited forms of the above, where it's objective. In some cases, like governance or law, it's almost entirely subjective with negligible scope for Ethereum to help.
99.99% of economics, institutions and the like are deeply human and subjective, which Ethereum or blockchains in general cannot interpret at all. Indeed, we've seen many a times how forcing subjectivity into objective code has led to many disastrous outcomes in crypto.
(Contd...) 9 replies
106 recasts
293 reactions
95 replies
32 recasts
116 reactions
7 replies
16 recasts
67 reactions
2 replies
112 recasts
276 reactions
$1000 Prize for AI Conference Organizer
When you’re collecting slides from many people for a conference, you need to *validate* those slides.
1) The first check is format. Is this PDF, Google Slides, Keynote, Figma, Canva? Is it a file or a URL?
2) The second check is deterministic. What is the size of each deck, the number of slides, the fonts used? Is video present, and if so is there audio?
3) The third check is probabilistic. Does the deck fit the conference format? For example, does it have a title slide? Is it all bullet points (which we don’t want) or does it have images? Each of these kinds of checks can be expressed as AI prompts.
What I want: an open source AI-based slide validator, with all the code at replit.com, which sets up a form that implements these three checks.
The workflow is: first paste in URL or upload file. Then determine format and run deterministic checks. Finally, run each AI check as an individual prompt. The result is a list of ❌and ✅ for every unit test. @bountybot 16 replies
83 recasts
274 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
69 replies
35 recasts
183 reactions
0 reply
11 recasts
27 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
15 replies
5 recasts
78 reactions
8 replies
3 recasts
167 reactions
