Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
Feels like a common problem for Farcaster. I think Warpcast has done a good job with curation and spam reduction... But in the process it hasn't stimulated a "conversation culture". You don't get any direct reputation value out of replying to ppl's casts. So ppl just QC instead. Making lots of low quality replies also punishes you, which is good. It's cut down on the pointless +1 replies. What we don't have is any incentive to actually start real conversations with ppl. To reply to ppl to give them validation we liked their post. Basically there's no mechanic that rewards friendships. On a platform that is hyper focused on reward incentives, having the most important activity be the least incentivized is what results in users feeling like they are "shouting into the void". Warpcast is doing great things, but what's really needed is to make conversations great again. Ideas, anyone?
5 replies
3 recasts
19 reactions
Mike | Abundance ๐
@abundance
Maybe it's not so much that Warpcast doesn't reward good conversations as much as there are other things going on in the feed that compete and drown out the good conversations?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
Yeah I've thought that as well. What are your thoughts on approaching this? I've been thinking a "trenches" feed that's all about the hype and coins, etc. And then maybe a "conversation" feed that's more tuned towards finding interesting discussions. I'm playing around with @fiids for making my own custom "feeds", but there's no algorithm stuff yet.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Tiago
@alvesjtiago.eth
that's an interesting separation. have you tried using boards in @fiids for that @trigs? that's how I separate my different areas of focus (eg in the screenshots). could easily see myself creating a board just for tracking hype and coins.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
https://warpcast.com/trigs/0x1a141e4e Yessir! You're right on the trail of this functionality!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction