Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/evm-6
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
EulerLagrangodamus - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Doesn’t the fact that a smart contract wallet is transferable break the idea of a soul bound token? SBTs are non-transferable, but if a contract wallet owns an SBT the wallet can be transferred to someone else.
17 replies
0 recast
28 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Yeah, but I don't think it invalidates the idea. Instead, it creates possibilities for users. E.g. I had argued that if you feel like account-binding to an EOA isprevents preventing key rotation (a common critique of SBTs), you could instead bind to a smart contract wallet.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
clun.eth
@clun.eth
But isn’t the criticism that if you bind an account bound token to a smart contract wallet that allows key rotation, then it’s easy to verifiably transfer ownership of that wallet to another key? I guess if the wallet address has a bunch of other on-chain reputation then it makes it harder to transfer.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
