PSA for future "shock images"

Warpcast will nerf folks for explicit images. It's not deterministic, our judgement. This isn't a court.

- I'll ask the user to delete the cast
- If they don't, I'll nerf on Warpcast

To be clear: the cast exists at the protocol.

Similar to websites, Google doesn't have to index you.

there you go alternative client developers, here is a real market Warpcast is not willing to serve explicitly

Founder /kiwi-news, a decentralized Hacker News

.@dwr.eth btw I think nerfing the user is wrong here. WC should censor the post and someone should build a porn version of WC. But those users should not be nerfed but the posts for users that want to use vanilla WC and porn client at the same time (although having two accounts may also be fine)

It‘d be nice if Warpcast has a nerfed user transparency log

Agree: nice to have cast-level nerfing, but right now we have the tool that we have.

My pov: while the network is still gated, expectation for a bit more flexibility around what's acceptable, etc.

But as soon as the network is 100% permissionless, all bets are off and problem needs to be treated as adversarial.

I think nerfing the user is much easier. Censoring each post manually will be pretty hard once the protocol grows and AI might detect false positives and censor innocent posts.