Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA for future "shock images" Warpcast will nerf folks for explicit images. It's not deterministic, our judgement. This isn't a court. - I'll ask the user to delete the cast - If they don't, I'll nerf on Warpcast To be clear: the cast exists at the protocol. Similar to websites, Google doesn't have to index you.
31 replies
5 recasts
74 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
More on nerfs here: https://warpcast.notion.site/Nerfs-3226885de1554031b2902ac2d3f9b15c I also suspect Warpcast will eventually have automatic NSFW categorization for images.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Carlos Diaz pfp
Carlos Diaz
@carlosdiaz
So basically what you are saying here is that the promise of a censorship resistant platform doesn’t resist common sense and political correctness?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Not picking a fight. Genuinely curious. (And ❤️ debate) If users have option to unfollow, hide, mute, block, why does client need to nerf? So long as it’s not harming or threatening another person, why take such a heavy hand? I’m not saying you are wrong, just trying to understand your logic and policy.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
there you go alternative client developers, here is a real market Warpcast is not willing to serve explicitly
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

brian is live on unlonely pfp
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
mb for the pic was just testing something out I will say tho this furthers my point that clients >> protocols
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

yesyes pfp
yesyes
@yesyes
Can you add an image detection AI to automatically blur suspected NSFW content and warn the users that the image might contain inappropriate stuff?(ofcourse give the users an option to unblur it for themselves).That would be nice.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
will you nerf the cast or the user?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jeff Feiwell  pfp
Jeff Feiwell
@hyper
I’ve only posted a couple shirtless selfies Dan, a DM would have sufficed
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️ pfp
nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️
@nir
Apple is the final boss in the decentralization game
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

eric pfp
eric
@ericxtang
Would be great to have the nerf service as a public good (or at least a public ally accessible service) for all client developers. I’ve been thinking about that a lot - Livepeer can offer AI based tagging for NSFW videos, and clients can decide what to do.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Much appreciated, Dan. Sincerely. This is a kindness for those of us who wish to keep our feeds completely free of such images.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Is this in response to something?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
I find this to be an interesting datapoint about culture. Bluesky had to deal with this within a month (ish) of users having invites. Farcaster made it pretty far with just "stern warnings" from @dwr.eth. (I say this with no knowledge of what the 🚾 team is dealing with behind the scenes.)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
Clean, decisive leadership, good job. Bluesky is in the midst of a messier one.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sagar Dhawan pfp
Sagar Dhawan
@sagar
I knew I shouldn't have uploaded this... https://warpcast.com/sagar/0xe80d02
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
There are explicit images here? 👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adrian pfp
Adrian
@maurerbot
Caster gonna love this dic…. *delete cast*
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Royal pfp
Royal
@royalaid.eth
This is actually a great way to incentivize decentralizing the client-base!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

aerique pfp
aerique
@aerique.eth
I assume we're using the US definition of "explicit" here? What kind of shock image was posted?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction