timbeiko.eth pfp
timbeiko.eth
@tim
Every node on the network validates every transaction it sees, and a non staking node will ignore a block that does not follow its protocol rules even if validators say it is correct. This is why it’s important to have full nodes: they are a check on validators. We should have a better word for “validator” 😅!
10 replies
7 recasts
105 reactions

/ / / / . KNNY® pfp
/ / / / . KNNY®
@knny
let's rebrand validator to transaction enjoyoor
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kyle pfp
Kyle
@banta
Word choice and naming is definitely one of cryptos weakest skill sets haha. 200 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
100 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EWO pfp
EWO
@ewo
Full nodes are validators of validators
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Johns pfp
Johns
@johns
Yeah, "validator" in the staking context should be renamed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

parseb pfp
parseb
@parseb.eth
staked node
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rks pfp
Rks
@itsrks
so non-staking nodes are not contributing to network security ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

callum pfp
callum
@csmit
(‼️) this gives me more motivation to set up a full node
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

parseb pfp
parseb
@parseb.eth
47 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction