timbeiko.eth
@tim
More and more convinced the only way you ever get blockchain transaction privacy is at the L1 level: anything which has a targetable entity or is opt-in is unlikely to ever be viable.
10 replies
2 recasts
63 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Been saying this for years, and been working on it too 🙂
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
✳️ dcposch
@dcposch.eth
What's the most minimalist version of this that would work?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
donnoh
@donnoh.eth
aren’t L1s opt-in as well?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike Connor
@mike-connor
I’m hoping our L2 will be viable…
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
parseb
@parseb.eth
this renewed sense of urgency due to most recent developments?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MrGox
@mistergox.eth
But then the L1 gets banned from legal usage. No merchant will accept it no cex will trade it See monero
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
[email protected]
🌎💻
@mikesylphdapps
Does this realization change how you might personally prioritize anything on the roadmap?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shadi 📄
@sepehrnoush.eth
the inherent nature of blockchain transaction privacy underscores the critical importance of addressing it at the foundational protocol level (L1). Opt-in solutions or those involving targetable entities inherently introduce vulnerabilities, making robust privacy measures difficult to achieve..
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mia
@mia20
Great point! For truly private transactions, on-chain (L1) solutions seem most promising
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
punk8125.eth
@8125
98 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
