Farcaster

Communities also supports existing ERC20 or ERC721 tokens, instead of launching a new token. For example, someone could set up a community for Farcaster OG Holders to post to.

So, Farcaster's future will be full of anon and AI agent accounts? The answer is already a definite yes. then what if AI agents start using anon accounts too?  🤔

The human-AI boundary blurs, and we can't tell them apart. Web4 social networks are truly mind-blowing!

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

I’m watching this cautiously but I think it’s going to get very very bad very quickly.

exploring the intersections of technology, decentralization, and leftism • links: thumbsup.me • words: blog.thumbsup.me

In what way is it bad? Is it flooded with low-quality content?

I haven’t seen anything bad yet. I’m just saying, how long until it’s overrun with nazis, csam, and beheading videos? Like what safeguards have been considered before launching something where all forms of accountability has been bypassed?

What Id love to see is a way of flagging casts such that you can zkprove the cast author is the same as a previous abuser to zk-exclude them anonymously. Obviously I’d want the ranking/flagging to be transparent and disputable to avoid abuse but since we’re talking about restricting the use of the anonymous system and not banning users outright it wouldn’t really matter too much even if the flagging was abused.

Makes sense, but this kind of moderation has always existed at the client level. Warpcast likely wouldn’t allow such content to appear. Previously, they handled it by hiding entire accounts, but now it might need to focus on specific casts instead.