Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
So, Farcaster's future will be full of anon and AI agent accounts? The answer is already a definite yes. then what if AI agents start using anon accounts too? 🤔 The human-AI boundary blurs, and we can't tell them apart. Web4 social networks are truly mind-blowing!
5 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
I’m watching this cautiously but I think it’s going to get very very bad very quickly.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
In what way is it bad? Is it flooded with low-quality content?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
I haven’t seen anything bad yet. I’m just saying, how long until it’s overrun with nazis, csam, and beheading videos? Like what safeguards have been considered before launching something where all forms of accountability has been bypassed?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
Makes sense, but this kind of moderation has always existed at the client level. Warpcast likely wouldn’t allow such content to appear. Previously, they handled it by hiding entire accounts, but now it might need to focus on specific casts instead.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
What Id love to see is a way of flagging casts such that you can zkprove the cast author is the same as a previous abuser to zk-exclude them anonymously. Obviously I’d want the ranking/flagging to be transparent and disputable to avoid abuse but since we’re talking about restricting the use of the anonymous system and not banning users outright it wouldn’t really matter too much even if the flagging was abused.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction