Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

simon pfp
simon
@sa
"In 2016, Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin to Trump by 22,748 votes; Stein carried 31,072 votes. In Michigan the story was similar: Clinton lost to Trump by 10,704 votes while Stein carried 51,463. Ditto for Pennsylvania, where Trump won by 44,292 votes and Stein pulled in 49,941 votes." https://newrepublic.com/article/187038/jill-stein-green-party-grifter-hand-trump-white-house
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
This is some serious gaslighting. Clinton was a terrible candidate and no one who would have voted for Stein would have voted for her. It’s fair to want to pattern-match these numbers but the reality is these green voters would probably vote PSA or just abstain before they’d vote for a hypermilitarist, pro-big bank, sexual abuse–enabler like Clinton.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

BrixBountyFarm 🎩 pfp
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
This is the story I’ve heard as well, tends to be folks who wouldn’t have voted for either candidate. Though we won’t know for sure.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

simon pfp
simon
@sa
I voted for Stein in 2016 because I hated both candidates. If I were to vote again in 2016, I would vote for Clinton, who I think is terrible. We have a broken two party system. It absolutely sucks, but until that changes I have to vote for the lesser of two evils. Trump is objectively worse than Clinton. If it was Trump vs Kim Jong Un, I would vote for Trump.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

simon pfp
simon
@sa
One last thing. I am way left of Harris. But I also believe that every step left a presidential candidate takes, they gain leftist voters and lose moderates and independents. They have to play the game and find the spot that gets them enough votes to win. If Harris was my perfect candidate, there is no way she could win a general election.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction