Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
simon
@sa
"In 2016, Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin to Trump by 22,748 votes; Stein carried 31,072 votes. In Michigan the story was similar: Clinton lost to Trump by 10,704 votes while Stein carried 51,463. Ditto for Pennsylvania, where Trump won by 44,292 votes and Stein pulled in 49,941 votes." https://newrepublic.com/article/187038/jill-stein-green-party-grifter-hand-trump-white-house
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
This is some serious gaslighting. Clinton was a terrible candidate and no one who would have voted for Stein would have voted for her. It’s fair to want to pattern-match these numbers but the reality is these green voters would probably vote PSA or just abstain before they’d vote for a hypermilitarist, pro-big bank, sexual abuse–enabler like Clinton.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Stuart
@olystuart
Have the Dems considered taking responsibility for their own failures, or not being war criminals?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
aferg
@aaronrferguson
Don't forget Jill Stein's "anti war", "pro peace" and "demilitarization" policies just so happen to disproportionately benefit autocratic countries like Russia. And surprise surprise! She's so deeply corrupted by these autocratic handlers that she even attended the 10-year anniversary gala of Russia Today (Putin's banned propaganda news network) and she sat next to Dmitry Peskov, Putin's national security advisor who constantly spouts disinformation and truly reprehensible statements about Ukrainians. This is the company that Stein not only keeps - but purposeful seeks out. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/guess-who-came-dinner-flynn-putin-n742696
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
