Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Iāll take an opposing view for the sake of the feed š«” āNever speak badly of others when they are not in your presenceā implicitly benefits actors with reach, suppresses dissent, entrenches existing power dynamics, and reduces coordination for those who need it most under the guise of āpro-social behaviorā
11 replies
1 recast
27 reactions
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
You make a great point. What I would say is that if you have to say something bad, treat it with great gravity and as a serious thing. Often the problem with gossip is that it is done very lightly as entertainment, rather than as a warning to others etc.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Super fair - i reflect a lot on how the nature of discourse over time shifted from āserious people talking serious thingsā to ānothing is ever seriousā or worse āfaux outrage under a cloak of seriousnessā imo the most eloquent communicators seamlessly shift between gravitas and humor in public and private
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
TheModestThiefš©
@thief
one of the bad effects of gossiping is just losing the confrontation skills - and by that i mean resolving tension/uneasy feelings in a civil way (probably discourse too).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
can be true but i think these are two parallel discussions really in everyday life w a relatively homogenous social class-> sure, poke your neighbor. That's a reasonable burden in society in our min-max world of Elons (and their simp armies) -> no way, the individual shouldn't have the burden to confront the BBEG
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction