The Curious Hermitage

Popped into ChatGPT to have it update the "psychoanalysis" of Farcaster for me so I can revise my strategy now that Moxie has been here for a couple weeks.

Might be interesting to consider your own strategies accordingly ;)

Devotional polytheist living a monastic lifestyle centered on curiosity, simplicity, and joy.  Exploring the intersection of technology and spirituality.

Photographer of magical places and collector of experiences. /enchanted-forest 
https://linktr.ee/KristinPiljay

I asked it to!  I was just playing around with it one day towards the end of last year, and decided to see if adjusting my content strategies accordingly would do anything.  I went from less than 100,000 impressions on Facebook to 2 million, then did it again scaling from 300,000 to 4.4 million after my accident.  Applied the same technique here - it goes beyond that initial prompt where I do a Needs Gap Analysis and see how my particular niche can fill some needs in the network in a way that's mutually beneficial.

It's considering Farcaster as a "sentient entity?" That seems kind of creepy. 😂 Why would it compare it to a human brain? Interesting.  I like what it had to say though and agree with a lot of it. I'm assuming this is the paid version? I'm going to sign up for that today. Free version is too limited.

Invisible Gardener. Regen practices. Degen research. Building StatelessDAO open source co-ops. Pixeloodles & Degenomemetics:  https://zora.co/@invisiblegardener

Me, too!  When I first framed the question to ChatGPT months ago with Facebook, the idea was that all the intentions and casts of the founders, devs, and users are like the "thoughts" of this "entity", so what sort of "thoughts" do I want to put into the void that can best benefit both me *and* the network?  I tried it with Facebook and boosted my growth there by like 600%, so when I came here, I tried it again.  Finding what the network needs and how that aligns with what I can give for mutual benefit.

Founders

Interesting to see that ChatGPT and I are aligned on WHAT the FC ecosystem needs more of... reflection on values and the solutions to the problem of exploitation... 

But it will be interesting to see if /founders are more receptive to that message when it comes from AI vs human authors.

HOW to encourage the integration of values that curb exploitative approaches? I wrote a bit about that here: https://paragraph.xyz/@degenaissancedigest/philosophy-for-web3-builders?referrer=0xd5f45430f18f31FcB4b5129b618e24A9bafaC1e3 - I'd be curious to see what your ChatGPT client would think about using Rawlsian ethics (or something else) in the context of its responses to your previous queries... 

...and a 3785 $farther 🎁 to help care for the 🐈s!

Once a Marine. Author, traveler, philosopher. Chaotic Good. Enjoys quiet walks near charismatic megafauna 🇺🇳🏳️‍🌈 https://paragraph.xyz/@degenaissancedigest

Some of that ChatGPT alignment is because I've had a LOT of conversations with it about my own philosophies and visions for my life and the world, and it's now got persistent memory features, so it "knows" me :D 

I started playing with this idea of a "sentient social media platform" late last year with Facebook as an experiment to see what it would do with my follower stats if I started curating content according to that analysis.  What does the Facebook entity need to become "healthier" and then feed it that.  The results were I went from less than 100,000 impressions to 2 million impressions between January and May, had a dip to 300,000 after my accident, and in a month, brought it up to 4.4 million impressions.

I applied the same theory to Farcaster.  Have ChatGPT analyze it for me, do a needs analysis, determine how my content could fill that gap.  Farcaster needs community, it needs interesting content, and I'm really good at both of those.