ted (not lasso) on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

100 USDC for... 1. defining with me what qualifies a user to be low quality / spam 2. creating a list of FIDs of all low quality / spam users 3. creating an easy way for me to mute all those FIDs 4. creating a way for me to repeat #3 daily / weekly will make time to meet with you today or tomorrow :) @bountybot

22 replies

9 recasts

147 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

if you support this mission, please contribute by replying "add [amount] USDC" and tag the bounty bot. thank you!!!

3 replies

0 recast

7 reactions

logonaut.eth 🎩 ツ ↑ 🍖 pfp

logonaut.eth 🎩 ツ ↑ 🍖

@pixel has done some work in this direction, using reaction:cast ratio to identify and rank the spammiest users of the past 7 days. https://dune.com/queries/3035483/5046273

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

greyseymour.eth pfp

greyseymour.eth

@bountybot add 30 USDC

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp

add 20 USDC @bountybot

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

grin pfp

@bountybot add 20 USDC also i have some ideas. been talking to @rish about this -- you can use @neynar webhooks to automatically hide/ban casts with a certain phrase in them (eg $degen or "follow back"). this lets you declare your channel a no-shilling zone or whatever

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

@ghostlinkz.eth you have a way to filter out for outcasters newsletter right? you may know your criteria and how to do it programmatically. muting as far as I know is manual procedure as it pertains to only warpcast as client, not the protocol. There fore easy repeat would work by providing ted with a list of links

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

not parzival pfp

have you defined a low-quality user yet? some ideas: - more than 50% of content includes ticker or url - beyond 1:100 follower:following ratio - less than 1 in 20 casts is liked

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

christopher pfp

1. feels more philosophical now that we’re achieving hypergrowth. i think my guiding principle is content as a result of a real > simulated filter.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

dinislam pfp

I’m hopeful (and quite confident) that this will be mostly a solved problem in a few weeks via: - muting channels - muting casts - muting words - an ML classifier to nerf spammy casts - repeated violations results in the account being nerfed

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

bark bark pfp

I would like to see a client that maximizes noise-control for users. I.e. allow the user to fully tailor their experience based on what they want to see, read, and hear from their feed and if they distaste a cast make it super easy for them to disengage with that caster/type of post/channel/group.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

kerman pfp

Happy to do 1-2 for free. Spent a lot of time thinking about it: https://kermankohli.substack.com/p/the-4-problems-of-airdrops

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

MORBID-19 🎩🖼️ pfp

MORBID-19 🎩🖼️

I support this bounty 1000 $DEGEN

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

saluberis pfp

my list of user where most of casts contains: - fallow for fallow - recast, fallow, like for mint - tip for tip

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Anniceris 🎩 pfp

Would be awesome if we could assign reputation to accounts so ones we or our follows trust/non spammy gets surfaced better. Number of followers or likes etc have poor sybil resistance qualities.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

AtnsFarts pfp

Hmmm don’t know but I mark every one that spams. But I am afraid if this backfires at me.For example at X you get shadowbanned if you block too many .Does this also applies here ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction