Some thoughts off the top about Tucker's interview of Sam Bankman-Fried:
1) Tucker deliberately doesn't address SBF's business, in favor of other topics, which is fine, but it also allows SBF to reiterate talking points about them that don't really grapple with the steel-man argument against what he did.
2) SBF is lying about not taking Adderall. His defense lawyers actually asked the judge to delay trial until he could get it. 
3) SBF provides an inside look at some of the genuine problems with our justice system, including the failure to provide inmates appropriate legal resources and ways to pursue meaningful pursuits, as well as the Feds' use of borderline extortive pressure tactics.
4) SBF is still an effective altruist. No rumination on how it might have helped him rationalize his alleged crimes.
5) Tucker, who tries to nudge SBF to care about things like family, comes off far more human of the two.

INTEL: SBF Moved To Solitary Confinement After Giving Tucker Interview Without Approval

Solid Intel 📡

update on SBF 😅 
https://x.com/solidintel_x/status/1898128186862457001?s=46&t=TCtcqPWuRO8Caq4J16izgQ

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

lmaoo what first im seeing this

sbf wild

How does he give a video interview without approval?!? 🤣

My man sbf! Chad energy i believe is the technical term here