ted (not lasso) on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

it is WILD to me that we only have allowlists for minting and NOT for secondary sales. that’s not how the trading of art, luxury goods, family heirlooms, homes, even surfboards works. most secondary marketplaces IRL have a curation layer to filter buyers. this is why NFT marketplaces lose volume to private txns :)

18 replies

5 recasts

56 reactions

six pfp

This can be done at the token contract layer. I don’t think it makes sense at the marketplace layer because if I’m an owner and want to get around that to sell my token I’d just use a different marketplace

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp

Matthew Fox 🌐

/highlight just shipped this (kind of) https://warpcast.com/rekdaus/0x1a027123 I have mixed feelings about its implementation being adjustable post mint but the idea is cool if communicated upfront But this also just exposed that any creator can rug their highlight collection anytime 🙃

3 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

🌹 zach harris 🥀 pfp

🌹 zach harris 🥀

@zachharris.eth

@ted reading btw the lines private placement maxi

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Simon pfp

Pretty sure opensea had this feature a while back where you could set allowlists for secondary. Might be wrong but swore there was something like this. But also I think this gets into a deeper conversation about truly “decentralized” NFTs/assets when/if this becomes a thing.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Tarun Chitra pfp

Rybolovlev isn’t buying NFTs… yet!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

🎩 MxVoid 🎩 pfp

🎩 MxVoid 🎩

I think private txns *are* that curation layer for secondary sales. The ecosystem is too small and young for that sort of marketplace specialization—with few exceptions, sellers want liquidity, buyers want smooth txns that settle quickly. In those rare exceptions, you have private txns and the trad auction houses.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜

maybe helpful for you @ted this tutorial shows you how to add allow lists in any aspect of Frames and apps, and also has an SDK to add with just a couple lines of code https://docs.airstack.xyz/airstack-docs-and-faqs/guides/farcaster/proof-of-personhood-for-farcaster-frames

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

amtwo 🎩 pfp

Why would this asset need to be an NFT in that case? Having permissions on an asset that I buy will make me less likely to buy it.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tmophoto pfp

This is exactly how some art becomes suddenly and wildly more valuable because of provenance. The longer the string of high profile owners the more valuable it gets sometimes. Applies to cars even more so.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Nettra 👁️ 🌴 pfp

Nettra 👁️ 🌴

Agree that this should be more intuitive. Most great NFTs are not listed at all - a big opportunity. The only way I've seen it done in the past is by artists listing for specific wallets (you can do it on OpenSea) - but not listing their item publically otherwise.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lata pfp

+1 I did wonder this when https://fountaindigital.xyz/ emerged too

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

jd 🌺 pfp

does anything prevent this from being the norm? could one bake the curation into the contract

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

floar.eth 🎩🔵⚪️ pfp

floar.eth 🎩🔵⚪️

Agree, I think curation allows trading of culture, but many projects go to secondary marketplaces not because they want to proliferate culture, but because they want volume / price action

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Miro pfp

Haven't thought about it like that, but I guess if you want real ownership you should also be able to have allowlists for secondary sales.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Joshua pfp

Depends on what your version of secondary sales means. Adding allowlists for secondary sales would require adding access group roles to be implemented at the Smart Contract layer of the NFT Collection. Roles like Curator, Buyer & Seller can work where Buyers & Sellers are approved by Curators along w/ sell/buy requests

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

↑Dom pfp

@onchaindom.eth

Wow, took me a second but this makes total sense. If you have true ownership, that should extend to allowlisting when you sell. Seems inevitable.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xSprint pfp

This will be a given in hindsight. NFT marketplaces are now building for crypto native audiences where most collections still have little real world grounding. The more NFT's will trickle down to consumer apps, utility, NFT's grounded in 'real world' use cases, the more allowlist features for secondary marketplaces.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kritter 🎩 pfp

I really don’t think this should become a thing. People are free to gift collections, people are free to sell to pre-arranged buyers for whatever price they like, or they can go to the open market where the price is the ‘allowlist’. Adding more false scarcity isn’t the way

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction