teddit

it is WILD to me that we only have allowlists for minting and NOT for secondary sales.

that’s not how the trading of art, luxury goods, family heirlooms, homes, even surfboards works.

most secondary marketplaces IRL have a curation layer to filter buyers.

this is why NFT marketplaces lose volume to private txns :)

highlight

really cool idea... I made it a reality!

This collection's NFTs are

- "casterbound", meaning they can only *ever* be owned by Farcaster users
- mintable only by people who follow @v, @dwr.eth and @sum

https://highlight.xyz/mint/65e77686ff87ceeb82ab94ad

/highlight just shipped this (kind of)

https://warpcast.com/rekdaus/0x1a027123

I have mixed feelings about its implementation being adjustable post mint but the idea is cool if communicated upfront 

But this also just exposed that any creator can rug their highlight collection anytime 🙃

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

Mini apps will eat the internet | Latest drop: TRIVIA 💸| Building : /large /fctrivia /miniapps /flappycaster /jeeves /source @degentip @playsource /jump



wow, thanks for highlighting (pun intended) this.

@emodi, i think this is GOATed. this feature is exactly what artists and curators and collectors want.

if you believe masterworks will flop (as i do), then perhaps you also know that who the buyer is *always* matters when it comes to true art.

that a creator can change this post sale and the buyer isn't made aware ahead of purchase

even a flag that this is possible would be nice

kinda like opensea has "metadata frozen or not" 

but this is far more severe imo

losing the independence to sell to who ever you like for something you bought erks me

We've thought about this! Creators can lock down their contracts, ensuring collectors that behaviour is immutable