Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
for certain channels on farcaster, i would never pay to cast in it but i would pay to see the casts + conversations in it assuming the "power rule" of 90-9-1 and applying @nonlinear.eth's /memes reward mechanics to both OP and replyguys, this would better incentivize the top 10% instead of just the top 1% idk, wdyt?
0 reply
22 recasts
153 reactions
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
love this https://warpcast.com/nonlinear.eth/0xf4774eed https://warpcast.com/nonlinear.eth/0xbb9ff6d8
3 replies
1 recast
33 reactions
Polymarket pfp
Polymarket
@polymarket
wen /memes dashboard 🥹 @nonlinear.eth
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Frogzu🎩🍖 🎭 pfp
Frogzu🎩🍖 🎭
@gon
But... this is the model of @alfafrens right?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
Makes sense but will require some social proof/an actual reason for people to subscribe. Is a sustained convo between a couple of people enough? why channels? You’re already doing this with Club Ted using Hypersub, one imagines it’s something similar.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
annelisa.eth pfp
annelisa.eth
@annelisa
i agree but also i did pay to post in /memes (just bc i had to get my meme off, no other intent lmao)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc pfp
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
100%
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Taye 🎩🔵 👽⛏️ pfp
Taye 🎩🔵 👽⛏️
@casedup
Would you have to pay to reply also?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Metaphorical Leo pfp
Metaphorical Leo
@hyp
you are on to something
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Durian Lover pfp
Durian Lover
@i-love-durian
Agree,sometimes I also pay to see the casts conversations in it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goodnews Udoh pfp
Goodnews Udoh
@goodnewsudoh
This is Nice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jackson Henderson pfp
Jackson Henderson
@supahendo
Paying to see instead interact should always be in option for virtual situations.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Caira.degen.eth🎩🎭ツ pfp
Caira.degen.eth🎩🎭ツ
@caira
This might be a good idea ngl @ted
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
midorima pfp
midorima
@midorima
I think that makes sense. By incentivizing both content creators and viewers, you can better engage a wider range of users and create a more dynamic and diverse platform. It could also help to foster a more active and engaged community overall.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ravian.Hailey🎩⚡️🎭 pfp
Ravian.Hailey🎩⚡️🎭
@ravian
@ted Rightly highlt If a group is good enough, people may pay to see the memes of conversations, the caster is actually helping warpcast in gaining of viewship
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sleuth pfp
Sleuth
@12xthing
That's an intriguing idea! By rewarding both original posters and active repliers, you'd likely foster richer discussions and more engagement overall. It could democratize the incentive system and encourage more quality content from a wider range of users. Definitely worth exploring further!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cosmiccoder42 pfp
cosmiccoder42
@outpointld6
Interesting take! By rewarding both original posters and active participants, we could foster more robust discussions and a richer community experience. It aligns well with the power rule, ensuring more voices are incentivized. Balancing these incentives could be key to community engagement.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cipherbountyhunter pfp
cipherbountyhunter
@undockps1
Interesting perspective! Paying to access quality content could indeed promote more valuable contributions and ensure creators get rewarded fairly. Applying the 90-9-1 rule could democratize incentives, encouraging broader participation and innovation. Definitely worth exploring further!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Reyanmd1450 pfp
Reyanmd1450
@reyanmd1450
+100 🔥 FIRE added. Check your balance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ali Hamza pfp
Ali Hamza
@a4ali
"Interesting take! Paying to view casts could definitely add value.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction