
thibrazzia2
@thibrazzia2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
The Berachain airdrop controversy has sparked distrust within its community, as users criticize the allocation favoring insiders and NFT holders over active testnet participants. This perceived unfairness undermines the project's governance fairness, as it suggests centralized control rather than equitable community involvement. Disproportionate rewards for early investors and developers, like the alleged 200,000 BERA sold by "DevBear," fuel resentment, risking community fragmentation. Transparent criteria, broader participation in decision-making, and audited distribution could restore faith. Without addressing these issues, Berachain's governance risks alienating its base, hindering long-term decentralization and adoption. 0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction