Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Michael Pfister
@pfista
I’ve always assumed having a portable social graph is a net positive and something I’d want At Threads scale it turns out people used the app more when they rebuilt a graph from scratch rather than importing from instagram The good news with Farcaster is that it’s always an option and up to each client to decide how to onboard users. And channels are a good way to creating new sub graphs aka cozy corners Raises questions around why people wouldn’t want to import their graph. The chameleon factor. People want isolated communities where they can express themselves differently depending on the audience My behavior already reveals this- I post slightly different things to different networks
8 replies
18 recasts
116 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
cc @heavygweit and @christopher who have thought a lot about this, love their thinking
2 replies
0 recast
41 reactions
christopher
@christopher
Adam probably already knew this but his directive was to grow the app base first and worry about retention later. People want to make new friends and discover new things. That’s how you get them to come back to any app daily.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
erica
@heavygweit
Comments on the likelihood we’ll still have a multi account future if people prefer to compartmentalize their personas that way But I think that preference is a reflection of all of social being on centralized databases until today, and not necessarily our natural state. It’ll take a while to unlearn a lot of the habits and preferences we developed from fractured centralized social experiences
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
