Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Michael Pfister
@pfista
I’ve always assumed having a portable social graph is a net positive and something I’d want At Threads scale it turns out people used the app more when they rebuilt a graph from scratch rather than importing from instagram The good news with Farcaster is that it’s always an option and up to each client to decide how to onboard users. And channels are a good way to creating new sub graphs aka cozy corners Raises questions around why people wouldn’t want to import their graph. The chameleon factor. People want isolated communities where they can express themselves differently depending on the audience My behavior already reveals this- I post slightly different things to different networks
8 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
cc @heavygweit and @christopher who have thought a lot about this, love their thinking
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
In Threads following matters less due do their algorithmic feed. Same in Bluesky with their Discovery feed. My main annoyance with that is that they keep showing me content that I don't really want. Especially Threads.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Les Greys
@les
Have many thoughts around this too. There is definitely a strong effect still of the “chameleon factor”, I also suspect that behavior will change as tech adoption evolves.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason
@jachian
Im curious now which countries
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bullers
@db
hmm that's interesting and understandable. Different personas for different communities
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
SO, is it like moving from one place to another place? You don't want to take your clutter with you!!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pete
@corporatefilth.eth
Makes sense. My IG friends are not my Twitter friends etc
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Zach Lipp
@zachlipp
a thought I hadn’t considered, thanks for sharing 500 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
